Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] unpack_trees_options: free messages when done
From: Elijah Newren <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-18 22:30:50
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 2:33 PM, Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:23:27PM +0200, Martin Ågren wrote:quoted
diff --git a/unpack-trees.c b/unpack-trees.c index 79fd97074e..60293ff536 100644 --- a/unpack-trees.c +++ b/unpack-trees.c@@ -103,6 +103,8 @@ void setup_unpack_trees_porcelain(struct unpack_trees_options *opts, const char **msgs = opts->msgs; const char *msg; + opts->msgs_to_free.strdup_strings = 0; +[...] +void clear_unpack_trees_porcelain(struct unpack_trees_options *opts) +{ + opts->msgs_to_free.strdup_strings = 1; + string_list_clear(&opts->msgs_to_free, 0);I like this string_list approach much better, but it's too bad we have to go through these contortions with the strdup flag to get the memory ownership right. If we had a string_list_appendf(), then we could just leave that flag alone and this:quoted
@@ -118,8 +120,9 @@ void setup_unpack_trees_porcelain(struct unpack_trees_options *opts, ? _("Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by %s:\n%%s" "Please commit your changes or stash them before you %s.") : _("Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by %s:\n%%s"); - msgs[ERROR_WOULD_OVERWRITE] = msgs[ERROR_NOT_UPTODATE_FILE] = - xstrfmt(msg, cmd, cmd); + msg = xstrfmt(msg, cmd, cmd); + msgs[ERROR_WOULD_OVERWRITE] = msgs[ERROR_NOT_UPTODATE_FILE] = msg; + string_list_append(&opts->msgs_to_free, msg);would become: msgs[ERROR_WOULD_OVERWRITE] = msgs[ERROR_NOUPTODATE_FILE] = string_list_appendf(&opts->msgs_to_free, msg, cmd, cmd)->string; I don't know if that's worth it or not (I suspect that there are other places where appendf would be handy, but I didn't poke around).
The strdup_strings=1 immediately before calling string_list_clear() has been used in one other place in merge-recursive.c, and tripped up the reviewer requiring a big code comment to explain it. (See the very end of https://public-inbox.org/git/CABPp-BGh7QTTfu3kgH4KO5DrrXiQjtrNhx_uaQsB6fHXT+9hLQ@mail.gmail.com/ ). So there's already one other place in merge-recursive.c that might benefit from such a change. A quick search shows about half a dozen other sites throughout the code that are doing something similar: $ git grep -3 strdup_strings | grep -B 1 string_list_clear bisect.c: refs_for_removal.strdup_strings = 1; bisect.c- string_list_clear(&refs_for_removal, 0); -- builtin/shortlog.c: onelines->strdup_strings = 1; builtin/shortlog.c- string_list_clear(onelines, 0); -- builtin/shortlog.c: log->list.strdup_strings = 1; builtin/shortlog.c- string_list_clear(&log->list, 1); -- mailmap.c: me->namemap.strdup_strings = 1; mailmap.c- string_list_clear_func(&me->namemap, free_mailmap_info); -- mailmap.c: map->strdup_strings = 1; mailmap.c- string_list_clear_func(map, free_mailmap_entry); -- merge-recursive.c: entry->possible_new_dirs.strdup_strings = 1; merge-recursive.c- string_list_clear(&entry->possible_new_dirs, 1); -- revision.c: revs->notes_opt.extra_notes_refs.strdup_strings = 1; revision.c- string_list_clear(&revs->notes_opt.extra_notes_refs, 0); Maybe someone wants to tackle that as a separate patch series? (Maybe we make it a micro-project for future GSoC'ers?)