Re: [PATCH] alloc.c: replace alloc by mempool

Stefan Beller [off-list ref] writes:

The replacement with mem-pool might be easier than making sure
that alloc.c has no globals and handles allocations per repository
correctly. It would make the sb/object-store-alloc series shorter than
it currently is, and maybe easier to review the code.

However now that sb/object-store-alloc is rerolled with keeping
the logic of alloc.c and not replacing it with mem-pool, the only
reason would be ease of maintainability by less code

That is sensible considertation; the patch should be sold as such,
instead of with an empty log message as if the reasoning is obvious
to everybody without being told ;-)