Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2018-04-11

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Lazy-load trees when reading commit-graph

From: Jakub Narebski <hidden>
Date: 2018-04-11 20:41:31

Derrick Stolee [off-list ref] writes:
On 4/7/2018 2:40 PM, Jakub Narebski wrote:
quoted
Derrick Stolee [off-list ref] writes:

[...]
quoted
On the Linux repository, performance tests were run for the following
command:

     git log --graph --oneline -1000

     Before: 0.92s
     After:  0.66s
     Rel %: -28.3%

Adding '-- kernel/' to the command requires loading the root tree
for every commit that is walked. There was no measureable performance
change as a result of this patch.
In the "Git Merge contributor summit notes" [1] one can read that:
quoted
- VSTS adds bloom filters to know which paths have changed on the commit
- tree-same check in the bloom filter is fast; speeds up file history checks
- if the file history is _very_ sparse, then bloom filter is useful
Could this method speed up also the second case mentioned here?  Can
anyone explain how this "path-changed bloom filter" works in VSTS?
   
The idea is simple: for every commit, store a Bloom filter containing
the list of paths that are not TREESAME against the first parent. (A
slight detail: have a max cap on the number of paths, and store simply
"TOO_BIG" for commits with too many diffs.)
Isn't Bloom filter with all bits set to 1 equivalent of "too big"? It
would answer each query with "possibly in set, check it".
When performing 'git log -- path' queries, the most important detail
for considering how to advance the walk is whether the commit is
TREESAME to its first parent. For a deep path in a large repo, this is
almost always true. When a Bloom filter says "TREESAME" (i.e. "this
path is not in my set") it is always correct, so we can set the
treesame bit and continue without walking any trees. When a Bloom
filter says "MAYBE NOT TREESAME" (i.e. "this path is probably in my
set") you only need to do the same work as before: walk the trees to
compare against your first parent.

If a Bloom filter has a false-positive rate of X%, then you can
possibly drop your number of tree comparisons by (100-X)%. This is
very important for large repos where some paths were changed only ten
times or so, the full graph needs to be walked and it is helpful to
avoid parsing too many trees.
So this works only for exact file pathnames, or does checking for
subdirectory also work?  I guess it cannot work for globbing patterns
(like "git log -- '*.c'").

I guess that it speeds up "git log -- <pathname>", but also "git blame
<pathname>".


Sidenote: I have stumbled upon https://github.com/efficient/ffbf project
(fast-forward Bllom filters - for exact matching of large number of
patterns), where they invent cache-efficient version of Bloom filter
algorithm.  The paper that the project is based on also might be
interesting, if only because it points to other improvements of classic
Bloom filters.
quoted
Could we add something like this to the commit-graph file? 
I'm not sure if it is necessary for client-side operations, but it is
one of the reasons the commit-graph file has the idea of an "optional
chunk". It could be added to the file format (without changing version
numbers) and be ignored by clients that don't understand it. I could
also be gated by a config setting for computing them. My guess is that
only server-side operations will need the added response time, and can
bear the cost of computing them when writing the commit-graph
file. Clients are less likely to be patient waiting for a lot of diff
calculations.
So the problem is performing large amount of diff calculations.  I
wonder if it would be possible to add Bloom filters incrementally, when
for some reason we need to calculate diff anyway.
If we add commit-graph file downloads to the protocol, then the server
could do this computation and send the data to all clients. But that
would be "secondary" information that maybe clients want to verify,
which is as difficult as computing it themselves.
Can you tell us how much work (how much time) must spend the server to
calculate those per-commit "files changed" Bloom fillters?

Best,
--
Jakub Narębski
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help