Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
I think I'd agree on it being a release blocker. Given that your fix is
really a one-liner (3 of the lines are just changing the variable name,
which I agree with), I'd be fine with applying it on top rather than
reverting the original, even if it means delaying the release slightly.
It seems like about the same amount of risk to me.
Yeah, I would say we should just apply the rfc/patch as-is directly
on 'master'.
... which just has happened.
Thanks.