Igor Djordjevic [off-list ref] writes:
[...]
quoted
quoted
Hmm, still rushing it, but what about adding an additional step,
something like this:
I think it's unneeded, as it should work fine without it, see another
reply.
Unfortunately, I have a broken test case saying different - it could
very well be a flawed test, too, but let`s elaborate in that
other sub-thread[1], indeed.
Yeah, I was too fast to reply and I was wrong, sorry about it.
-- Sergey