Re: [PATCH 2/7] worktree.c: add update_worktree_location()
From: Duy Nguyen <hidden>
Date: 2018-02-02 09:36:11
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Eric Sunshine [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:53 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
diff --git a/worktree.c b/worktree.c@@ -326,6 +326,24 @@ int validate_worktree(const struct worktree *wt, struct strbuf *errmsg) +void update_worktree_location(struct worktree *wt, const char *path_) +{ + struct strbuf path = STRBUF_INIT; + + if (is_main_worktree(wt)) + die("BUG: can't relocate main worktree"); + + strbuf_add_absolute_path(&path, path_); + if (fspathcmp(wt->path, path.buf)) { + write_file(git_common_path("worktrees/%s/gitdir", + wt->id), + "%s/.git", real_path(path.buf));For the path stored in 'worktrees/<id>/gitdir' (and in wt->path), this and other worktree-related code sometimes treats it only as "absolute path" and sometimes as "real path". As a reviewer, I'm having trouble understanding the logic of why, how, and when this distinction is made. Can you explain a bit to help clarify when "absolute path" is good enough and when "real path" is needed?
Of the top of my head, I think it's "anything but a relative path". real_path() is normally used to normalize paths before I compare them. Writing a normalized path down is nice to avoid "../" but I don't think it's strictly necessary. Well, it's also prettier when you have to print the path out. Printing "/foo/bar/abc/../../xyz" is not nice. Hmm.. looking back in add_worktree(), we also write "gitdir" with real_path(). I think the problem here is that I should have real_path()'d "path.buf" _before_ doing fspathcmp(). Maybe that's where the confusion's from. -- Duy