Re: [PATCH] status: add a failing test showing a core.untrackedCache bug
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2017-12-27 18:09:31
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2017-12-28 · Re: [PATCH] status: add a failing test showing a core.untrackedCache bug · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2017-12-27 · Re: [PATCH] status: add a failing test showing a core.untrackedCache bug · Eric Sunshine <hidden>
- 2017-12-27 · Re: [PATCH] status: add a failing test showing a core.untrackedCache bug · Duy Nguyen <hidden>
- 2017-12-26 · Re: [PATCH] status: add a failing test showing a core.untrackedCache bug · Duy Nguyen <hidden>
- 2017-12-25 · Re: [PATCH] status: add a failing test showing a core.untrackedCache bug · Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <hidden>
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
+status_is_clean() { + >../status.expect && + git status --porcelain >../status.actual && + test_cmp ../status.expect ../status.actual +} + test_lazy_prereq UNTRACKED_CACHE ' { git update-index --test-untracked-cache; ret=$?; } && test $ret -ne 1@@ -683,4 +689,43 @@ test_expect_success 'untracked cache survives a commit' ' test_cmp ../before ../after ' +test_expect_success 'teardown worktree' ' + cd .. +'
Funny indentation.
+test_expect_success 'setup worktree for symlink test' ' + git init worktree-symlink && + cd worktree-symlink && + git config core.untrackedCache true && + mkdir one two && + touch one/file two/file && + git add one/file two/file && + git commit -m"first commit" && + git rm -rf one && + ln -s two one && + git add one && + git commit -m"second commit" +'
This needs SYMLINKS prereq, which in turn means it cannot be tested on certain platforms. I thought Duy's answer was that this does not need to involve a symbolic link at all? If so, perhaps we can have another test that does not need symlink? Thanks.