Re: [PATCH v1] convert: add support for 'encoding' attribute
From: Torsten Bögershausen <hidden>
Date: 2017-12-18 10:13:58
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 09:47:24PM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Am 11.12.2017 um 16:50 schrieb lars.schneider@autodesk.com:quoted
From: Lars Schneider <redacted> Git and its tools (e.g. git diff) expect all text files in UTF-8 encoding. Git will happily accept content in all other encodings, too, but it might not be able to process the text (e.g. viewing diffs or changing line endings). Add an attribute to tell Git what encoding the user has defined for a given file. If the content is added to the index, then Git converts the content to a canonical UTF-8 representation. On checkout Git will reverse the conversion. Reviewed-by: Patrick Lühne <redacted> Signed-off-by: Lars Schneider <redacted> --- Hi, here is a WIP patch to add text encoding support for files encoded with something other than UTF-8 [RFC]. The 'encoding' attribute is already used to view blobs in gitk. That could be a problem as the content is stored in Git with the defined encoding. This patch would interpret the content as UTF-8 encoded andThis will be a major drawback for me because my code base stores text files that are not UTF-8 encoded. And I do use the existing 'encoding' attribute to view the text in git-gui and gitk. Repurposing this attribute name is not an option, IMO.
Just to confirm my missing knowledge here: Does this mean, that git-gui and gitk can decode/reencode the content of a file/blob, when the .gitattributes say so ? If yes, would it make sense to enhance the "git diff" instead ? "git diff --encoding" will pick up the commited encoding from .attributes, convert it into UTF-8, and run the diff ? We actually could enhance the "git diff" output with a single line saying "Git index-encoding=cp1251" or so, which can be picked up by "git apply". The advantage would be that we could continue to commit in UTF-16 as before, and avoid the glitches with .gitattributes, that Peff pointed out. Does this make sense ?
quoted
it would try to reencode it to the defined encoding on checkout > Plus, many repos define the attribute very broad (e.g. "*encoding=cp1251").
Is this a user mistake ?
quoted
These folks would see errors like these with my patch: error: failed to encode 'foo.bar' from utf-8 to cp1251-- Hannes