Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] exec_cmd: RUNTIME_PREFIX on some POSIX systems
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-28 14:09:29
Hi Dan, and (based on the timezone recorded in your mail:) good morning! On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, Dan Jacques wrote:
quoted
In Git for Windows, we have an almost identical patch: https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/commit/bdd739bb2b0b We just guard the call to system_path() behind a test whether podir is already absolute, but these days, system_path() does that itself. I am too little of a Perl expert to be helpful with the other patches, but I would gladly runa build & test on Windows if you direct me to an easily-pullable branch.Oh interesting - I've only peripherally looked at Git-for-Windows code, since Chromium uses its packages verbatim (thanks, BTW!). I think you're correct though - this patch set seems to be doing the same thing.
Excellent, thanks for confirming.
I've been force-pushing my changes to the "runtime-prefix" branch of my Git fork for travis.ci testing. The latest commit on that branch adds a "config.mak" for testing, so one commit from the branch head will contain the sum set of this patch series applied at (or near) Git's master branch: https://github.com/danjacques/git/tree/runtime-prefix~1 Let me know if this is what you are looking for, and if I can offer any help with Windows testing. Thanks!
Thank you, that was exactly what I was looking for. BTW I think that your config.mak settings are partially unnecessary: the gitexecdir and template_dir should be identical, and sysconfdir, too (at least unless you override prefix). I triggered a build (with the config.mak commit, because it does not really matter), and it failed immediately due to a quoting issue: the path separator is a semicolon on Windows and therefore must be quoted (so that it is not misinterpreted as ending the command). There were a couple of other issues, too, and I opened a PR here: https://github.com/danjacques/git/pull/1 Ciao, Dscho