Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 05:29:01PM -0700, Jonathan Tan wrote:
quoted
At this point I decided that I prefer the thin wrapper, but the "light
touch" (struct oidmap_entry, oidcmpfn(), oidmap_get() only) still
better than the status quo.
OK. I can certainly live with that. And worst case, I suppose, is that a
caller wants some underlying hashmap function and we just have to extend
the oidmap API to include it. It's not like we're adding new hashmap
functions willy-nilly.
OK, I think I can live with that, too. I'll tentatively mark the
topic to be merged to 'next' but give it for a few days so that
others can stop me.
Thanks.