Re: Security of .git/config and .git/hooks
flat view
From: Stefan Beller <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-03 15:10:47
So once upon a time we compared Gits security model with a
web browser. A web browser lets you execute 3rd party code
(e.g. javascript) and it is supposedly safe to look at malicious sites.
Currently Git only promises to have the clone/fetch operation safe,
not the "here is a zip of my whole repo" case, which sounds more
like the web browser experience ("here is a site with js, even zipped
in transfer"). Tightening the security model of Git towards this seems
like a good idea to me.
quoted
1. Introduce a (configurable) list of "safe" configuration items that can be set in .git/config and don't respect any others.A whitelist is obviously safer than a blacklist. Though I also feel like some of the options may give an unexpectedly wide attack surface. I.e., I wouldn't be surprised if some innocent-looking option ends up being used in a tricky way to gain more access. E.g., submodule config pointing to paths outside of the repository. Do you plan to run in safe-mode all the time? What if safe-mode was a lot more extreme, and simply avoided reading repo-level config at all (except for check_repository_format(), which should be pretty innocent). I have a feeling there are some features (like submodules) that would simply be broken in safe-mode.
I would think that the essential submodule things would be "safe" to look at. But e.g. submodule.<name>.update = "!rm -rf /" would be not ok, hence the .update configuration would be in the unsafe space. Any unsafe config option would need to be set outside the actual repository (~/.config/git/<repo-id>/config ?)
quoted
2. But what if I want to set a different pager per-repository? I think we could do this using configuration "profiles". My ~/.config/git/profiles/ directory would contain git-style config files for repositories to include. Repositories could then contain [include] path = ~/.config/git/profiles/fancy-log-pager to make use of those settings. The facility (1) would special-case this directory to allow it to set "unsafe" settings since files there are assumed not to be under the control of an attacker.You can do something quite similar already: git config --global \ include.gitdir:/path/to/specific/repo.path .gitconfig-fancy-log-pager The main difference is that the profile inclusion is done by path rather than riding along with the repository directory if it gets moved. In practice I doubt that matters much, and I think the security model for include.gitdir is a lot simpler.
I am not sure if this works so well for the submodule.<name>.update config (that we want to deprecate anyway, but still)
quoted
For backward compatibility, this facility would be controlled by a global configuration setting. If that setting is not enabled, then the current, less safe behavior would remain.Are config and symlinks everything we need to care about? I can't think of anything else, but Git really has quite a large attack surface when accessing a local repo. Right now the safest thing you can do is "git clone --no-local" an untrusted repo and then look only at the clone. Of course nobody _actually_ does that, so any "safe" mode seems like it would be an improvement. But would claiming to have a "safe" mode encourage people to use it to look at risky repositories, exacerbating any holes (e.g., exploiting a bug in the index format)? I don't know.
Good point. Though we only care about the case of breaking out and executing untrusted code; most of the index exploits would rather trigger a segfault or infinite lop (in my imagination at least).
-Peff