Re: [PATCH] Win32: simplify loading of DLL functions

Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] writes:

Johannes Schindelin wrote:

quoted

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Jonathan Nieder wrote:

quoted

quoted

Could this example go near the top of the header instead?  That way,
it's easier for people reading the header to see how to use it.

Funny, I am *so* used to examples being at the very end, from tutorials to
man pages.

If my experience is any indication, I would rather keep this order.

Sorry for the lack of clarity.  I meant "near the top of the header
*file*".

Yeah, I think it would help to have something like that near the top
of the header file for the potential users of the helper.

FWIW nothing I noticed came to the level of requiring a v2 imho.  If any
of the ideas I mentioned seems good, they can go in patches on top.

True, too, and additional "doc in header" can also be done as a
follow-up.

But as I heard "v2 in a few days", I'll throw it in the "Expecting a
reroll" bin for now.

Thanks, both.