Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] writes:
Jeff King wrote:
quoted
What I missed is that copy_begin and copy_end here are actually size_t
variables, not the pointers. Sorry for the confusion, and here's an
updated version of the patch with this paragraph amended (the patch
itself is identical):
Subtle. The world makes more sense now. Thanks for figuring it out.
...
For what it's worth,
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <redacted>
Thanks, both. It seems that I missed all the fun ;-)