Re: [PATCH] sub-process: print the cmd when a capability is unsupported

Jonathan Tan wrote:

Christian Couder [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

In handshake_capabilities() we use warning() when a capability
is not supported, so the exit code of the function is 0 and no
further error is shown. This is a problem because the warning
message doesn't tell us which subprocess cmd failed.

[...]

quoted

Let's improve the warning() message, so that we can know which
subprocess cmd failed.

Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <redacted>

This looks reasonable to me.

I am still wondering if protocol errors should be fatal,

Yes, please.

Thanks,
Jonathan