Stefan Beller [off-list ref] writes:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Johannes Schindelin
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi Christoph,
On Fri, 11 Aug 2017, Dr.-Ing. Christoph Cullmann wrote:
quoted
on Windows 64-bit, for a repository having a .pack file > 4GB I get
during cloning:
The reason is Git's source code that over-uses the `unsigned long`
datatype.
In a nearby-thread, an underappreciated effort by Martin Koegler is
underway to get the ball rolling in getting it fixed. Maybe you can help
making Martin a lot more welcome on the Git mailing list, and maybe even
help getting his patches reviewed and integrated?
'nearby' as in [1] ;-)
[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/1502527643-21944-1-git-send-email-martin@mail.zuhause/
I had the impression the review is going well there?
I do not know if it is "going well", but I do not agree with the
"underappreciated" bit at all. I find such a blanket statement
toxic and detrimental to the community.
It is true that many topics in flight are broken with a tree-wide
change that is presented as a single ball of wax. Unlike the
ongoing "struct object_id" effort, which also is tree-wide but tries
to find a step-wise refinement to reduce its impact on other topics,
it is harder to integrate such a change. But that does not have any
relation to how much the effort is appreciated.