Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] An attempt to move packfile funcs to its own file

Jonathan Tan [off-list ref] writes:

What do you mean by "keep the exposed surface area small enough"? If you
mean the total number of exposed functions in sha1_file and pack (once
everything is done), I think it will be almost the same as that
currently in sha1_file.
...
During this patch set, there might be some functions that need to be
temporarily made global, but those are reverted to static in the end.

That is exactly what I meant.

As stated above, I don't think so, but I'll make a list of the functions
needing to be made global.

Good.

Thanks.