Re: [PATCH 1/4] imap-send: add wrapper to get server credentials if needed
From: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-07 17:11:09
Le 07/08/2017 à 18:30, Martin Ågren a écrit :
On 7 August 2017 at 16:03, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin <redacted> --- imap-send.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)diff --git a/imap-send.c b/imap-send.c index b2d0b849b..38b3c817e 100644 --- a/imap-send.c +++ b/imap-send.c@@ -926,6 +926,29 @@ static int auth_cram_md5(struct imap_store *ctx, struct imap_cmd *cmd, const cha return 0; } +static void server_fill_credential(struct imap_server_conf *srvc) +{ + struct credential cred = CREDENTIAL_INIT; + + if (srvc->user && srvc->pass) + return; + + cred.protocol = xstrdup(srvc->use_ssl ? "imaps" : "imap"); + cred.host = xstrdup(srvc->host); + + cred.username = xstrdup_or_null(srvc->user); + cred.password = xstrdup_or_null(srvc->pass); + + credential_fill(&cred); + + if (!srvc->user) + srvc->user = xstrdup(cred.username); + if (!srvc->pass) + srvc->pass = xstrdup(cred.password); + + credential_clear(&cred); +} + static struct imap_store *imap_open_store(struct imap_server_conf *srvc, char *folder) { struct credential cred = CREDENTIAL_INIT;@@ -1078,20 +1101,7 @@ static struct imap_store *imap_open_store(struct imap_server_conf *srvc, char *f } #endif imap_info("Logging in...\n"); - if (!srvc->user || !srvc->pass) { - cred.protocol = xstrdup(srvc->use_ssl ? "imaps" : "imap"); - cred.host = xstrdup(srvc->host); - - cred.username = xstrdup_or_null(srvc->user); - cred.password = xstrdup_or_null(srvc->pass); - - credential_fill(&cred); - - if (!srvc->user) - srvc->user = xstrdup(cred.username); - if (!srvc->pass) - srvc->pass = xstrdup(cred.password); - } + server_fill_credential(srvc); if (srvc->auth_method) { struct imap_cmd_cb cb;"cred.username" is checked further down, but now it will always be NULL, no?
You're right I missed this. Not sure if this is needed though. From what I understand this means the username/password are store for the next access to credential. but in the current state, there is only one. Maybe the credential_approved can be dropped ? Nicolas