Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] tag: only respect `pager.tag` in list-mode

On 21 July 2017 at 00:27, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

I tend to agree with you that 1-3/10 may be better off being a
single patch (or 3/10 dropped, as Brandon is working on losing it
nearby).  I would have expected 7-8/10 to be a single patch, as by
the time a reader reaches 07/10, because of the groundwork laid by
04-06/10, it is obvious that the general direction is to allow the
caller, i.e. cmd_tag(), to make a call to setup_auto_pager() only in
some but not all circumstances, and 07/10 being faithful to the
original behaviour (only to be updated in 08/10) is somewhat counter
intuitive.  It is not wrong per-se; it was just unexpected.

Thanks for your comments. I will be away for a few days, but once I
get back, I'll try to produce a v3 based on this and any further
feedback.

Martin