Re: [PATCH 2/2] tag: convert gpg_verify_tag to use struct object_id
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2017-07-13 21:23:07
Stefan Beller [off-list ref] writes:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Stefan Beller [off-list ref] writes:quoted
diff --git a/builtin/verify-tag.c b/builtin/verify-tag.c index f9a5f7535a..ed8329340f 100644 --- a/builtin/verify-tag.c +++ b/builtin/verify-tag.c@@ -56,20 +56,21 @@ int cmd_verify_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) } while (i < argc) { - unsigned char sha1[20]; + struct object_id oid; const char *name = argv[i++]; - if (get_sha1(name, sha1)) { + + if (get_oid(name, &oid)) { had_error = !!error("tag '%s' not found.", name); continue; }This part is already done, it seems, in bc/object-id topic, even though other parts are not yet done?Oops. I assumed the latest bc/object-id would have been in master already, but after checking it is not. 967635dc3c2 (builtin/verify-tag: convert to struct object_id) converts this part, although there are 2 differences: * I added a stray newline before get_oid * The argument to gpg_verify_tag is a sha1 or oid So yes, this produces a merge conflict. :/
That is OK. This actually shouldn't create any meaningful conflict. Both try to do the same code, with only a blank-line difference. As Brian said bc/object-id would be rerolled, I was wondering if I should queue these two patches (even though I already queued them) myself, or it would be better for you to send them to Brian to make it part of his series.