Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2017-06-13

Re: [RFC/PATCH] builtin/blame: darken redundant line information

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-13 18:06:27

Stefan Beller [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Stefan Beller [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
But you do not want to (yet)? The goal is not to tell you where the bounds
are, but the goal is to point out that extra care is required for review of
these particular 3 lines.
And when you _can_ help users in that "extra care" by pointing out
where the boundary is, what is the justification for hiding that
information?
...

And how many colors would be confusing for the user?
Well, having two "dimmed" for moved lines are not needed if we use
the same as context, so we can reduce the colors to just two
highlights times two (i.e. old and new).

Having said that,
I would think we want to start with a simple model ...
would be OK.  Let me configure the old-moved and new-moved to the
same as context and see if I can live with just a single highlight
color.

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help