Re: [PATCH v2] archive-tar: fix a sparse 'constant too large' warning

Ramsay Jones [off-list ref] writes:

In a similar vein, on systems which use a 64-bit representation of the
'unsigned long' type, the USTAR_MAX_SIZE constant macro is defined with
the value 077777777777ULL. Although this does not cause any warning
messages to be issued, it would be more appropriate for this constant
to use an 'UL' type suffix rather than 'ULL'.

... it is more appropriate because we know the recipient is
"unsigned long", not "unsigned long long", in this case?  As opposed
to the case of timestamp_t, which is opaque and could be "unsigned
long long"?

That makes sense to me, even though it took a bit of thinking aloud
to understand.

Looks good; thanks.