Re: [PATCH v3] perl: regenerate perl.mak if perl -V changes

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] writes:

We'll also redundantly trigger if you upgrade to a minor new perl
version, but I think that's squarely in "who cares" territory.
...
But I think overall leaning on the side of busting the cache more
often to avoid cryptic errors is the right choice, and we should use
"perl -V".

I'd throw it into "better safe than sorry" category.  I think we all
like the approach this patch takes.  Let's queue it and merge it
down soonish.

Thanks.