Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2017-03-28

Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] object_id part 7

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2017-03-28 17:32:49

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 04:01:22PM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote:
quoted
This is part 7 in the continuing transition to use struct object_id.

This series focuses on two main areas: adding two constants for the
maximum hash size we'll be using (which will be suitable for allocating
memory) and converting struct sha1_array to struct oid_array.
Both changes are very welcome. I do think it's probably worth changing
the name of sha1-array.[ch], but it doesn't need to happen immediately.

I read through the whole series and didn't find anything objectionable.
The pointer-arithmetic fix should perhaps graduate separately.
I didn't see anything incorrect when I queued the series, either,
and after I re-read it I saw a few minor readability issues, but
modulo that this looks ready.  I did split the push-cert parsing fix
and applied to an older base independently, though.
I suggested an additional cleanup around "linelen" in one patch. In the
name of keeping the number of re-rolls sane, I'm OK if we skip that for
now (the only reason I mentioned it at all is that you have to justify
the caveat in the commit message; with the fix, that justification can
go away).
A follow-up after the dust settles could also mention "we earlier
mentioned this caveat but with this fix we no longer have to worry
about it", no?


Thanks both, anyways.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help