Re: [PATCH v3 12/16] tag: implicitly supply --list given another list-like option

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Hmph, wouldn't we want to instead replace it with

        ... something to set expectation ... >expect &&
        git tag -n 100 >actual &&
        test_cmp expect actual &&

here?

Nope, we already have detailed tests for "tag -n 100" and the like and
what that output should actually return earlier in the patch,...

Then what you did is the right thing to do.  Thanks.