Re: RFC: Another proposed hash function transition plan
From: Jonathan Nieder <hidden>
Date: 2017-03-13 17:48:14
From: Jonathan Nieder <hidden>
Date: 2017-03-13 17:48:14
Hi, The Keccak Team wrote:
We have read your transition plan to move away from SHA-1 and noticed your intent to use SHA3-256 as the new hash function in the new Git repository format and protocol. Although this is a valid choice, we think that the new SHA-3 standard proposes alternatives that may also be interesting for your use cases. As designers of the Keccak function family, we thought we could jump in the mail thread and present these alternatives.
I indeed had some reservations about SHA3-256's performance. The main hash function we had in mind to compare against is blake2bp-256. This overview of other functions to compare against should end up being very helpful. Thanks for this. When I have more questions (which I most likely will) I'll keep you posted. Sincerely, Jonathan