Christian Couder [off-list ref] writes:
I think I just copy pasted the code from cmd_rev_list() in
builtin-rev-list.c and probably didn't realize that revs->tree_objects
would always be false.
Thanks for spotting this and removing the dead code.
Thanks for a quick confirmation. Just FYI I was looking at this code
because I was trying to assess how involved it would be to teach the
code to do a bisection only on the first-parent chain.