On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 04:02:33AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
Ugh. Actually, there are a few complications I found:
1. Checking "HEAD" afterwards means you can't actually have a branch
named "HEAD". Doing so is probably insane, but we probably really
_do_ want to just disallow the @-conversion here.
2. This isn't limited to just HEAD and @-conversion. For instance:
It's a bit what I was afraid of.
Luc