Re: [PATCH 3/3] rename_ref: replace empty deletion message in HEAD's log

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

Thinking on it more, we probably _do_ want two entries. Because the
operations are not atomic, it's possible that we may end up in a
half-way state after the first entry is written. And when debugging such
a case, I'd much rather see the first half of the operation logged than
nothing at all.

Yes, that sounds right.