Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2017-02-15

Re: Feature request: flagging “volatile” branches for integration/development

From: Herbert, Marc <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-15 00:13:50

[apologies for the accidental "smart" quotes and the resulting UTF8
encoding of the subject]

On 04/02/2017 06:01, Duy Nguyen wrote:
But that would be local information only. We don't have ways to
transfer branch metadata (and we definitely don't want to just share
.git/config file with everybody). I suppose extending git protocol for
this is not hard (e.g. appending metadata in the "have" lines).
Thanks Duy. So did you mean:

[ X ] send (big!) patches ?
The hard part may be policy (e.g. what if the user does not want a branch
to be treated volatile by various commands even if it receives such
flag from a git server).
There would be instant, human-readable value in such a new "volatile"
flag. Machine use and policies can be discussed later. These will be
easier to prototype, experiment and refine once the flag exists.

  ----

Interestingly, it was pointed to me (thanks Calvin) that GitLab has
implemented this volatile flag exactly. It's called... "work in progress":
https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/merge_requests/work_in_progress_merge_requests.html

I'm not familiar with GitHub, however browsing its documentation the
(in)existence of a pull request seems equivalent to a (non-)volatile
flag. Just like a pull request by email without the need to find and search
a mailing-list.

I'm familiar with Gerrit and there's no strict equivalent to a volatile
flag, however it's:
- totally obvious when the commit has been accepted and merged - hence
  its SHA1 final.
- usually fairly clear whether the code is still WIP or near the
  "pull request" stage based on: how the code review is going, approvals
  and other metadata.

Long story short: to integrate code reviews and source control these
systems overload git with a ton of metadata so it's no surprise to
always find in them something that more or less looks like a "volatile"
flag. I guess this leads to the more general question of core git possibly
implementing some generic metadata/property system (key,value pairs?
everything is a ref?) to better support code review and other
git-based software... Now I bet this on the other hand must have been
discussed (and rejected?) before, any pointer?


Marc




Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help