On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Johannes Schindelin
[off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Duy,

On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Duy Nguyen wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Johannes Schindelin
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Duy Nguyen wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Johannes Schindelin
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:

quoted

This squashes two changes from Johannes and Ramsay: [...]

Sorry, I lost track of the worktree discussions... Could you remind
me which patch is supposed to fix my continuous reflog corruption?

The corruption caused by git-gc? It's not fixed. All the changes in
this series is shown here.

Oh sorry, I meant to ask "and if it is not in this patch series, would you
mind pointing me at the patch series that has that fix?"

You meant this one [1]? There is nothing substantial since then.

[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/%3C20160601104519.16563-1-pclouds@gmail.com%3E/

I guess I mean that.

Given that this results in real data loss, it is surprising that this has
not made it even into `pu` yet!

I  could rebase and clean it up a bit if you need it, but I don't
think it'll end up in 'pu' or anywhere near since Junio wanted a
cleaner approach [1]. That means (as far as I can see) a lot more work
around refs store and backend area before it's ready to handle "get
refs from this worktree store" (or "get refs from every reachable
stores").

[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqshwwzyee.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com/

-- 
Duy