On 23 Jan 2017, at 19:22, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
larsxschneider@gmail.com writes:
quoted
Could you fast track the patch to `maint` if it works without trouble on
`next` (as it should!)?
Notes:
Base Commit: 787f75f056 (master)
I do not think there is any difference between 'maint' and 'master'
for this file right now, but I still would have appreciated if this
line also said 'maint', not 'master', if you want it to go to
'maint' eventually ;-) As https://travis-ci.org/git/git/builds seems
to be doing 'pu', too, hopefully we'll catch any issues there first.
You're right! My own automation betrayed me :-)
I made a tiny change, though. Can you queue v2?
http://public-inbox.org/git/20170122225550.28422-1-larsxschneider@gmail.com/
Thanks,
Lars