Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] doc: add documentation for OPT_STRING_LIST

Jacob Keller [off-list ref] writes:

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I do not know if it is clear enough that 'option' in the last
sentence is a placeholder.  I then wondered if spelling it as
`--no-<long>` would make it a bit clearer, but that is ugly.

To be fair, this is exactly how the rest of the doc spells these
things, so I would rather be consistent with the doc as is, and a
future patch could clean this up. See OPT_SET_INT, for an example of
`--no-option`.

Ah, OK, then I have no issues with it.

Maybe we can rephrase this "The list is reset via `--no-option`"?

I think I saw that in your latest interdiff and I think it is good.

Thanks.