Santiago Torres [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Squashing the following into this commit solves this issue with the
former approach. The lines it touches are all from 4/6 and I view
all of it as general improvement, including type correctness and
code formatting.
Thanks!
Should I re-roll this really quick? Or would you rather apply this on
your tree directly?
Nah, local squashing should be sufficient in this case. The squash
only touches a single patch from the original and it itself is easy
to review (and was reviewed already from what I can tell in this
thread).