Re: [PATCH 1/2] asciidoctor: fix user-manual to be built by `asciidoctor`

"brian m. carlson" [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

[1] I think we've also traditionally considered asciidoc to be the
    definitive toolchain, and people using asciidoctor are free to
    submit patches to make things work correctly in both places. I'm not
    opposed to changing that attitude, as it seems like asciidoctor is
    faster and more actively maintained these days. But I suspect our
    build chain would need some improvements. Last time I tried building
    with AsciiDoctor it involved a lot manual tweaking of Makefile
    variables. It sounds like Dscho is doing it regularly, though. It
    should probably work out of the box (with something like
    USE_ASCIIDOCTOR=Yes) if we expect people to actually rely on it.

Yes, that would probably be beneficial.  I'll see if I can come up with
some patches based on Dscho's work.

Thanks.