Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] road to reentrant real_path

On 01/09, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Brandon Williams [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

quoted

How does this relate to the 5-patch real_path: series that has been
on 'next' since last year?

The only difference should be in the first patch of the series which
handles the #define a bit differently due to the discussion that
happened last week.

Here is the interdiff between v5 and 'origin/bw/realpath-wo-chdir':

Then can you make that an incremental patch (or two) with its own
log message instead?  It (or they) would look and smell like a
bugfix patch that follows up a change that has already landed.  As
you know, we won't eject and replace patches that are already in
'next' during a development cycle.

Thanks.

Yes I'll get right on that.

-- 
Brandon Williams