Hi Hannes,
On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Am 22.12.2016 um 22:37 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
quoted
Would you have a suggestion how to rephrase the comment to make it
less confusing?
Perhaps
* This might close the cached console handle.
* We must cache the live duplicate instead.
Then update the cache before the dup2, because at this time all 3 of console,
handle, and duplicate are live and cannot be recycled:
if (console == handle)
console = duplicate;
dup2(new_fd, fd);
Good point. I reworded the comment slightly differently (see the interdiff
in v3 0/3), hope you don't mind.
Ciao,
Dscho