Re: [PATCH 1/3] wt-status: implement opportunisitc index update correctly
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-12-07 20:53:40
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-12-08 · Re: [PATCH 1/3] wt-status: implement opportunisitc index update correctly · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2016-12-07 · Re: [PATCH 1/3] wt-status: implement opportunisitc index update correctly · Stefan Beller <hidden>
- 2016-12-07 · Re: [PATCH 1/3] wt-status: implement opportunisitc index update correctly · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Stefan Beller [off-list ref] wrote:
So I would expect that we'd rather fix the update_index_if_able instead by checking for the lockfile to be in the correct state?
I actually don't expect that, after looking at other call sites of that function.