On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I did review both off and on list and I think the latest version is good.
I thought that there were strange mixups of two enumeration types
that are incompatible, at least. Is there an update that I didn't
see, or you didn't read problems pointed out on list?
Oh right; there was no resolution to that one IIRC.
quoted
quoted
* jt/use-trailer-api-in-commands (2016-11-02) 6 commits
..
quoted
From a cursory read (with the SQUASH applied)
this seems to be done to me.
We are not all that in a hurry to move non-fix to 'next' only with a
cursory read at this point in the cycle ;-).
But the cycle only applies to patches going to master, but when
asking for doneness I assumed you were asking for opinions on
the transition pu -> next, which I would support.
Thanks,
Stefan