Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-11-18

Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] grep: optionally recurse into submodules

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-11-18 22:01:37

Brandon Williams [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
@@ -300,6 +311,10 @@ static int grep_sha1(struct grep_opt *opt, const unsigned char *sha1,
 	if (opt->relative && opt->prefix_length) {
 		quote_path_relative(filename + tree_name_len, opt->prefix, &pathbuf);
 		strbuf_insert(&pathbuf, 0, filename, tree_name_len);
+	} else if (super_prefix) {
+		strbuf_add(&pathbuf, filename, tree_name_len);
+		strbuf_addstr(&pathbuf, super_prefix);
+		strbuf_addstr(&pathbuf, filename + tree_name_len);
 	} else {
 		strbuf_addstr(&pathbuf, filename);
 	}
@@ -328,10 +343,13 @@ static int grep_file(struct grep_opt *opt, const char *filename)
 {
 	struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
 
-	if (opt->relative && opt->prefix_length)
+	if (opt->relative && opt->prefix_length) {
 		quote_path_relative(filename, opt->prefix, &buf);
-	else
+	} else {
+		if (super_prefix)
+			strbuf_addstr(&buf, super_prefix);
 		strbuf_addstr(&buf, filename);
+	}
The above two hunks both assume that the super_prefix option is
usable only from the top-level (i.e. opt->prefix_length == 0) and
also "--no-full-name" (which is the default) cannot be used.  The
only invoker that runs "grep" with "--super-prefix" is the "grep"
that runs in the superproject, and it will only run us from the
top-level of the working tree, so the former assumption is OK.  

It is a bit unclear to me how the "relative" and "--recurse-submodules"
would interact with each other, though.


Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help