Re: [PATCH 00/11] git worktree (re)move

Duy Nguyen [off-list ref] writes:

The following patch should fix it if that's the same thing you saw. I
could pile it on worktree-move series, or you can make it a separate
one-patch series. What's your preference?

Giving a stable output to the users is probably a good preparatory
fix to what is already in the released versions, so it would make
the most sense to make it a separate patch to be applied to maint
then build the remainder on top.

I do not think "always show the primary first" is necessarily a good
idea (I would have expected an output more like "git branch --list").