Stefan Beller [off-list ref] writes:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Probably this needs to be squashed in, now the MinGW discussion has
settled.
I was about to propose this (and resend it non-rebased).
So I do not resend, but rather ask you to squash this patch?
That's OK. I've queued a "SQUASH???" separately for now and if we
need futher changes, you may want to resend, but I can locally
squash before merging it down to 'next' if it turns out that there
is no more changes necessary.
Thanks.