Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-10-12

Re: [PATCHv2] attr: convert to new threadsafe API

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-12 22:14:56

Stefan Beller [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
Well all of the hunks in the patch are not threaded, so they
don't follow a threading pattern, but the static pattern to not be
more expensive than needed.
Is it too invasive a change to make them as if they are thread-ready
users of API that happen to know their callers are not threading?
It would be ideal if we can prepare them so that the way they
interact with the attr subsystem will not have to change after this
step.
As far as I see the future, we do not need to change those in the future,
unless we add the threading to the current callers, which is usually a very
invasive thing?
It does not matter how invasive the thread set-up and teardown that
happens in the callers.

I am talking about the part of _THIS_ code that you are updating,
that interacts with attr API.  The way they prepare "check" and
"result", the way they ask questions by calling git_check_attr()
function.

Think of a thread-safe library function (like malloc()).  If you
write 

	func (...) {
		buf = malloc(20);
		...
		free(buf);
	}

in a function that happens to be only called in a non-threaded
program today, you do not have to update these calls to malloc(3)
and free(3) when you update the callchain to threadable, right?

That kind of thread-preparedness is what I am trying to see if we
can achieve with this update.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help