Re: [PATCH 1/6] git-merge: clarify "usage" by adding "-m <msg>"
From: Sergey Organov <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-05 20:49:40
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
sorganov@gmail.com writes:quoted
From: Sergey Organov <redacted> "-m <msg>" is one of essential distinctions between obsolete invocation form and the recent one. Add it to the "usage" returned by 'git merge -h' for more clarity. Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <redacted> --- builtin/merge.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/builtin/merge.c b/builtin/merge.c index a8b57c7..0e367ba 100644 --- a/builtin/merge.c +++ b/builtin/merge.c@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ struct strategy { }; static const char * const builtin_merge_usage[] = { - N_("git merge [<options>] [<commit>...]"), + N_("git merge [<options>] [-m <msg>] [<commit>...]"), N_("git merge [<options>] <msg> HEAD <commit>"), N_("git merge --abort"), NULLWhile this is not wrong per-se, as the deprecated form will go away soon, I hope you do not mind if I had to drop this one from the series to avoid merge conflicts to 'pu' (I do not know how bad the conflict would be yet; I am just reviewing in my MUA).
Yeah, sure. I was not aware obsolete form description is to go away soon.