Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2016-09-30

Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] ls-files: pass through safe options for --recurse-submodules

From: Brandon Williams <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-30 16:33:56

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On 09/29, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Brandon Williams [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
+static void compile_submodule_options(const struct dir_struct *dir, int show_tag)
+{
+	if (line_terminator == '\0')
+		argv_array_push(&submodules_options, "-z");
+	if (show_tag)
+		argv_array_push(&submodules_options, "-t");
+	if (show_valid_bit)
+		argv_array_push(&submodules_options, "-v");
+	if (show_cached)
+		argv_array_push(&submodules_options, "--cached");
+	if (show_deleted)
+		argv_array_push(&submodules_options, "--deleted");
+	if (show_modified)
+		argv_array_push(&submodules_options, "--modified");
+	if (show_others)
+		argv_array_push(&submodules_options, "--others");
+	if (dir->flags & DIR_SHOW_IGNORED)
+		argv_array_push(&submodules_options, "--ignored");
+	if (show_stage)
+		argv_array_push(&submodules_options, "--stage");
+	if (show_killed)
+		argv_array_push(&submodules_options, "--killed");
+	if (dir->flags & DIR_SHOW_OTHER_DIRECTORIES)
+		argv_array_push(&submodules_options, "--directory");
+	if (!(dir->flags & DIR_SHOW_OTHER_DIRECTORIES))
+		argv_array_push(&submodules_options, "--empty-directory");
+	if (show_unmerged)
+		argv_array_push(&submodules_options, "--unmerged");
+	if (show_resolve_undo)
+		argv_array_push(&submodules_options, "--resolve-undo");
+	if (show_eol)
+		argv_array_push(&submodules_options, "--eol");
+	if (debug_mode)
+		argv_array_push(&submodules_options, "--debug");
+}
With this and 4/4 applied, the documentation still says "--cached"
is the only supported option.

Does it really make sense to pass all of these?  I understand "-z"
and I suspect things like "-t" and "-v" that affect "how" things are
shown may also happen to work, but I am not sure how much it makes
sense for options that affect "what" things are shown.

What does it even mean to ask for say "--unmerged" to be shown, for
example, from the superproject?  Recurse into submodules whose cache
entries in the index of the superproject are unmerged, or something
else?

I am inclined to say that it is probably better to keep the
"--cached only" as documented, at least on the "what are shown"
side.

Thanks.
You're right that probably makes the most sense for now.

-- 
Brandon Williams
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help