Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/3] mailinfo: correct malformed test example

Jonathan Tan [off-list ref] writes:

  From: bogosity
    - a list
    - of stuff

Unchanged, the subsequent patch would break this test because it would
interpret that as a multi-line "From" in-body header when in-body
headers are *not* disabled.

Yes, that is totally expected.  So I would be perfectly fine if your
patch changed the test vector for that case, saying "Allowing a
folded in-body header means the expected result for the above three
lines has to change".