Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] Use the newly-introduced regexec_buf() function

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Also I agree with Peff that a test with an embedded NUL would be a
good thing.

This is something I will leave to somebody else, as it was not my
intention to fix this and I *really* have more pressing things to do right
now... Sorry!

As I said a few minutes ago, I think we can stop _before_ worrying
about an embedded NUL, which is something we haven't handled before
anyway so it is a new feature that can be built later outside the
scope of this series.