Re: [PATCH v6 13/13] read-cache: make sure file handles are not inherited by child processes

On 29 Aug 2016, at 20:05, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

larsxschneider@gmail.com writes:

quoted

From: Lars Schneider <redacted>

Consider the case of a file that requires filtering and is present in
branch A but not in branch B. If A is the current HEAD and we checkout B
then the following happens:

1. ce_compare_data() opens the file
2.   index_fd() detects that the file requires to run a clean filter and
    calls index_stream_convert_blob()
4.     index_stream_convert_blob() calls convert_to_git_filter_fd()
5.       convert_to_git_filter_fd() calls apply_filter() which creates a
        new long running filter process (in case it is the first file
        of this kind to be filtered)
6.       The new filter process inherits all file handles. This is the
        default on Linux/OSX and is explicitly defined in the
        `CreateProcessW` call in `mingw.c` on Windows.
7. ce_compare_data() closes the file
8. Git unlinks the file as it is not present in B

The unlink operation does not work on Windows because the filter process
has still an open handle to the file. Apparently that is no problem on
Linux/OSX. Probably because "[...] the two file descriptors share open
file status flags" (see fork(2)).

Wait, a, minute.  "that is no problem" may be true as long as "that"
is "unlinking the now-gone file in the filesystem", but the reason
does not have anything to do with the "open-file status flags";
unlike Windows, you _can_ unlink file that has an open file
descriptor on it.

I see. Thanks for the explanation.

And even on POSIX systems, if you are doing a long-running helper
any open file descriptor in the parent process when the long-running
helper is spawned will become leaked fd.  CLOEXEC is a possible
solution (but not necessarily the only or the best one) to the fd
leak in this case.

How much does the code that spawns these long-running helpers know
about the file descriptors that happen to be open?

Nothing really.

 The parent is
very likely to have pack windows open into .pack files and they need
to be closed on the child side after fork(2) starts the child
process but before execve(2) runs the helper, if we want to avoid
file descriptor leaks.

I think I understand what you are saying. However, during my tests
.pack file fd's were never a problem. I use start_command() [1]
which wraps the fork() and exec calls [2].

How would I find the open .pack file fd's? Should I go through 
/proc/PID/fd? Why is this no problem for other longer running 
commands such as the git-credential-cache--daemon or git-daemon?

Thanks,
Lars


[1] https://github.com/larsxschneider/git/blob/protocol-filter/v6/convert.c#L566
[2] https://github.com/larsxschneider/git/blob/protocol-filter/v6/run-command.c#L345-L412