Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-08-29

Re: [PATCH v14 07/27] bisect--helper: `bisect_reset` shell function in C

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-29 17:07:22

Pranit Bauva [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
with the original

    case $# in
    0)  reset to the branch ;;
    1)  reset to the commit ;;
    *)  give usage and die ;;
    esac

and took the difference and reacted "ah, excess parameters are not
diagnosed in this function".

Your caller does complain about excess parameters without giving
usage, and that is what I missed.

I am not sure if you intended to change the behaviour in this case
to avoid giving the usage string; I tend to think it is a good
change, but I didn't see it mentioned in the proposed commit log,
which also contributed to my not noticing the test in the caller.
I could include this in the commit message.
Nah, it was something anybody could notice with 2 more minutes of
reading and pondering from the patch text alone.  Not worth spending
more time on the log message on this one.

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help