Re: [PATCH v6 05/13] pkt-line: add packet_write_gently()
From: Lars Schneider <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-26 09:40:54
On 25 Aug 2016, at 23:50, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote: larsxschneider@gmail.com writes:quoted
From: Lars Schneider <redacted> packet_write_fmt() has two shortcomings. First, it uses format_packet() which lets the caller only send string data via "%s". That means it cannot be used for arbitrary data that may contain NULs. Second, it will always die on error.As you introduced _gently in 3/13, the latter is no longer a valid excuse to add this function. Just remove the sentence "Second, ...".
Agreed!
quoted
Add packet_write_gently() which writes arbitrary data and returns `0` for success and `-1` for an error. This function is used by other pkt-line functions in a subsequent patch. Signed-off-by: Lars Schneider <redacted> --- pkt-line.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)diff --git a/pkt-line.c b/pkt-line.c index cad26df..7e8a803 100644 --- a/pkt-line.c +++ b/pkt-line.c@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@#include "run-command.h" char packet_buffer[LARGE_PACKET_MAX]; +static char packet_write_buffer[LARGE_PACKET_MAX]; static const char *packet_trace_prefix = "git"; static struct trace_key trace_packet = TRACE_KEY_INIT(PACKET); static struct trace_key trace_pack = TRACE_KEY_INIT(PACKFILE);@@ -155,6 +156,17 @@ int packet_write_fmt_gently(int fd, const char *fmt, ...)return (write_in_full(fd, buf.buf, buf.len) == buf.len ? 0 : -1); } +int packet_write_gently(const int fd_out, const char *buf, size_t size) +{ + if (size > sizeof(packet_write_buffer) - 4) + return -1; + packet_trace(buf, size, 1); + memmove(packet_write_buffer + 4, buf, size); + size += 4; + set_packet_header(packet_write_buffer, size);It may not matter all that much, but from code-reader's point of view, when you know packet_write_buffer[] will contain things A and B in this order, and when you have enough information to compute A before stasrting to fill packet_write_buffer[], I would prefer to see you actually fill the buffer in that natural order.
I did that because when packet_write_stream_with_flush_from_fd() calls packet_write_gently() then buf[] is actually packet_write_buffer[]: https://github.com/larsxschneider/git/blob/d474e6a4c2523b87624a07111eb7a4f2dcd12426/pkt-line.c#L185-L192 Therefore I would override the first 4 bytes. However, the code evolved for some reason in that way but looking at it now I think that is an obscure, likely meaningless optimization. I'll use a separate buffer in packet_write_stream_with_flush_from_fd() and then fix the order here following your advice.
Do you anticipate future need of non-gently variant of this function? If so, perhaps a helper that takes a boolean "am I working for the gently variant?" may help share more code.
With helper you mean "an additional boolean parameter"? I don't see a need for a non-gently variant right now but I will add this parameter if you think it is a good idea. How would the signature look like? int packet_write_gently(const int fd_out, const char *buf, size_t size, int gentle) This would follow type_from_string_gently() in object.h. Thanks, Lars