Re: [PATCH] for-each-ref: add %(upstream:gone) to mark missing refs
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-24 18:06:22
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:50:23PM +0200, Øystein Walle wrote:
git branch -vv will show "gone" next to a remote tracking branch if it does not exist. for-each-ref is suitable for parsing but had no way of showing this information. This introduces "%(upstream:gone)" to display "gone" in the formatted output if the ref does not exist or an empty string otherwise, analogous to git branch -vv.
Hmm. So this sounds like the minimum thing to implement "branch -vv" output, but it feels sort of weirdly non-orthogonal. I guess you'd say: %(upstream:track)%(upstream:gone) and assume that only one of them will show any data. I almost wonder if %(upstream:track) should just output some specific token for the "gone" case, which matches what "branch -vv" does. (I'm also not sure we can match "branch -vv" exactly here anyway, as it looks like "[%(upstream): %(upstream:track)"], but our "%(upstream:track)" uses its own brackets.) I suppose that is a backwards-incompatible change for "%(upstream:track)", but I'm not sure how much we have promised about its format. The error cases seem totally undocumented.
--- Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt | 5 +++-- ref-filter.c | 10 +++++++++- t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh | 12 ++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
The code itself looks OK to me (assuming we want upstream:gone as the interface), with a few minor nits in the test:
+test_expect_success 'Check that :gone produces expected results' ' + cat >expected <<-\EOF && +gone + EOF
The "<<-" will strip leading tabs, meaning you can indent "gone" here to match the rest of the test.
+ test_when_finished "git config branch.master.merge refs/heads/master" && + git config branch.master.merge refs/heads/does-not-exist &&
I thought this could be test_config, but it is not clever enough to restore an old value, only to remove a value we just added. So this is probably the best solution.
+ git for-each-ref \ + --format="%(upstream:gone)" \ + refs/heads >actual && + test_cmp expected actual +'
This tests only that we show "gone"; do you want to add a second branch and make sure that it shows nothing? Maybe you could even use a new branch name, which makes test_config applicable again: cat >expected <<-\EOF && master no-upstream gone EOF git branch refs/heads/no-upstream && test_config branch.no-upstream.remote . && test_config branch.no-upstream.merge refs/heads/does-not-exist && git for-each-ref --format="%(refname:short) %(upstream:gone)" >actual && test_cmp expected actual -Peff